USAID Funding Cuts Spark Malaria Surge and Mosquito Net Shortages in Zimbabwe

USAID Cuts Threaten Malaria Progress in Zimbabwe

The key point is that the withdrawal of USAID funds under President Donald Trump’s administration has severely undermined Zimbabwe’s malaria control efforts, causing a dramatic resurgence of the disease. In 2025, Zimbabwe recorded 115 malaria outbreaks, a sharp increase from just one outbreak the previous year. This surge occurred only six months after critical US funding for research and national response programs was halted, highlighting the direct impact of financial support on disease control.

Immediate Impact of Funding Withdrawal

The funding cuts led to a shortage of essential mosquito nets and reduced support for malaria research. These resources had been crucial in preventing transmission and guiding effective interventions. Experts warn that without sustained funding, decades of progress in reducing malaria cases are at risk. Zimbabwe’s health officials reported that the lack of bed nets contributed to increased mosquito bites, directly correlating with the outbreak numbers.

Timeline of Malaria Outbreak Escalation

The timeline began with the US halting USAID malaria-related funding in early

2025. Within three months, distribution of mosquito nets stopped, and research into new control methods slowed. By mid-2025, Zimbabwe saw a spike in malaria cases, culminating in 115 outbreaks recorded nationwide. This contrasts sharply with data from 2024, when only one outbreak was reported, underscoring the rapid deterioration in malaria control.

Quantitative Evidence of the Crisis

The numbers speak volumes: 115 outbreaks in 2025 versus 1 in 2024 represent a 11, 400 percent increase in reported malaria flare-ups. This alarming figure is backed by official health ministry statistics and independent research groups monitoring disease trends in Zimbabwe. Previous USAID-supported programs had contributed to a 70 percent reduction in malaria incidence between 2010 and 2023, demonstrating the efficacy of sustained funding.

Consequences for Public Health and Research

The loss of US support has not only affected mosquito net distribution but also crippled malaria research projects that aimed to develop new prevention tools and treatment protocols. These programs had a proven track record; for example, USAID funding helped reduce malaria mortality rates by nearly 50 percent over the past decade. With these programs stalled, experts fear a reversal of gains and increased mortality in vulnerable populations, especially children under five.

Call for Renewed International Support

Experts and Zimbabwean health officials are urging the Biden administration and global donors to restore and increase funding to malaria control programs. They emphasize that re-establishing support could quickly reduce outbreak numbers and prevent thousands of deaths. Historical data shows that resuming comprehensive malaria interventions can reduce cases by up to 60 percent within one year, making funding restoration a critical priority.

Encouraging Reader Engagement on Funding and Health

What do you think about the impact of foreign aid on disease control in countries like Zimbabwe?

Have you seen similar effects in other health crises after funding cuts?

Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below. Your insights can help raise awareness about the importance of sustained global health investments.